As a teacher mom, I
often find myself telling Emery how to do school (I say telling because he
never asks). For example, his ELA teacher has an assignment where students are
to read for 20 minutes four to five times a week and log their reading time, #
of pages read, and some sort of response (find and define a word you didn’t
know, summarize what you read, etc.) Okay, so it’s not as bad as Accelerated
Reader, but this approach, to me, doesn’t promote a love of reading either—it’s
just more school work. I’d rather students journal once a week on what they
read outside of school or even just talk about it. They read enough for
learning in school, already, in my opinion. I see this assignment as a way of
monitoring reading—don’t get me wrong, the best way to improve comprehension
and vocabulary is through reading . . . but the point of this post is to share
with you how I modified this assignment for my own purposes and to teach Emery
how to do school.
Therefore, he reads
throughout the week, but he writes all of his logs on Sunday. I know, this
approach could be seen as procrastination, but if he’s doing his twenty minutes
of reading in the car, it’s a little inconvenient to pull out his reading log
and record the metaphors in the twenty pages he read. I guess it’s more about
me and my desire that he not feel the urge to enter a reading log entry every
time he reads. I know what I like as a teacher, and I just assume all teachers
appreciate the same efforts (I know this is not true and narrow-minded of me).
But there are other
examples as well. I encourage him to bring copies of his KidsDiscovery on topics that they are studying in Social Studies. I
tell him to occasionally record extra entries or put forth a little thought
into his presentations—but I must add, I have never done his work for him
except once when he had to embroider a Christmas tree parabola for math.
There clearly is a
set of rules that accompany being successful in school. For the most part, one
must be quiet, follow directions, sit still for long periods of time, and be
well-organized. Creativity, independent thought, and messiness are discouraged.
A few years ago, I read Doing School: How We Are Creating a Generation
of Stressed-Out, Materialistic, and Miseducated Students by Denise Clark Pope. In this study (which is quite readable), Pope
follows five high school students attempting to achieve academic and
extracurricular success. She reveals the short cuts, tricks, and often
disturbing attempts these students undertake to meet their academic goals.
I just finished (this morning, which
is why my post is late, I read most of yesterday) Walter Kirn’s Lost in the Meritocracy: The Undereducation of an
Overachiever. Talk about someone who “did” school. In fact, when he lost sight of “doing
school” which I’m beginning to realize means cheating, taking short cuts, buttering
up one’s teachers, and in many cases, taking drugs and using alcohol (which Kirn
takes to extremes). There’s an interesting lesson that “doing school” leads to breakdowns,
despair, and really not much fun at all.
Is there any hope at all? I can see now why some parents turn to unlearning—which
reminds me, I need to review Anderson’s latest book.
I've been happy with our school district's work at adjusting classwork to fit a student's abilities and skill level. Reading logs in the elementary school are very simple. Read for, at minimum, the proscribed amount of time, date the entry and have a parent sign-off.
ReplyDeleteI've always been in favor of the "just read" theory where kids read whatever they like as long as they are reading. Both the 2nd and 5th grade teachers for my kids do well at focusing on appropriate texts and then discussion of story, plot, character, feeling, relation to the kids lives, so on, so forth. Both my kids read very well but the teachers pick out books that a juvenile can relate to and understand. The boys can and do read more advanced books but that does not mean they will comprehend all actions and emotions that are presented.
My wife and I definitely discourage messiness in school work. I check Boy #1's math homework every night. Many times I have discovered errors in his work because his handwriting is so poor he misread his own numbering. For example, substituting a 1 for 7.
Regarding your comment about creativity. I don't fully agree. But, it reminds me of a talk I heard by Leonard Sax - I'm sure you've heard of the guy - where he gave an example of sex differences. Kids are asked to write a story and then have a roundtable discussion with the teacher. A girl will write about unicorns and rainbows and cats. A boy will write about cars and explosions and knives. The female school teacher will say, 'You can't write about that.' The kid just had his ideas and work disparaged and dismissed. Sax's arguments for sex-based class separations may be valid or not but his writing example is right on.
My kids are just as likely to write about cars and explosions and cats. "That kitty is so cute. Why do you always call them evil? Look how cute he is."
Thanks for the insights. Cute cats can't be evil, can they?
ReplyDelete